• PatFusty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      214
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      It was not ‘pictures of monkeys’ it was art. It was digital art. If you don’t get that then you don’t understand money laundering.

      • tyler
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        You can’t money launder with bitcoin. The whole purpose is that everything is traceable.

        • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          45
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago
          1. Joe gives Kevin $1mil worth of Cocaine.
          2. Joe draws an ape in MS paint.
          3. Kevin buys the digital ape drawing from Joe for $1mil in Bitcoin.

          That is how you launder money with art and Bitcoin.

          • Buttons
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            8 months ago

            Because it’s normally suspicious if someone gives $1mil for no reason, but if you know it’s for a monkey jpeg, then it’s normal.

            • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              8 months ago

              I have no idea if it attracted the attention of any regulatory body but yeah that’s pretty much how it went down as far as I know

          • tyler
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s not how it goes. Laundering works because you don’t have to report the sale, you just have to report the income. If you can track the sale then laundering never will work.

      • Bipta@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        56
        ·
        8 months ago

        Most people who bought them are likely still in the green compared to holding the cryptocurrency they used to purchase them, which itself is with more than the USD used to purchase the crypto.

        So you’d probably be disappointed.

          • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            8 months ago

            Wow some clowns spent nearly half a million on some of the laziest JPGs ever drawn. Wish I had been in on a grift like that. If someone can afford to spend that much on a PNG they don’t need the money so it is basically victimless.

            • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              8 months ago

              But it also come with extra privileges like going to exclusive parties where powerful UV lights can cause eye damage

          • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            And aren’t the bored apes the ones that somewhat held their value over time ? I heard somewhere that all the other jpgs NFTs plummeted even harder