Like this:

But replace “Hawaii” with your location.

🙃

  • SuperApples@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    5 days ago

    We were in this scenario last year, when NK launched a missile towards Hokkaido, and we were on the west coast, just next to a nuclear reactor.

    After getting the altert, we put on clothes, went downstairs to the sturdiest room, stuck on the TV to the NHK news, and waited. The missle plopped into the ocean off the coast, and we had tempura for lunch.

    There’s really nothing you can do in these situations but stay calm and do the small, sensible things.

    • tht@social.pwned.page
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Modern nuclear reactors won’t meltdown if shot, just turn off so only gonna be more dangerous if they specifically target electricity infrastructure

      • SuperApples@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        If they are built and maintained correctly. And meltdown isn’t the only problem that could occur.

        I don’t have much faith in a corrupt, self-regulated industry, with strong yakuza ties, to do things 100% the correct way, especially given everything we know about the industry post 2011. Knowing how much local political power the company has, I know they could literally get away with murder, as no politician or police would want to be on their bad side.

        Don’t get me wrong, the missile was still the biggest threat, but I do believe the power plant isn’t necessarily safe. An engineering and/or scientific understanding of a modern power plant doesn’t mean shit if you don’t consider the political and capitalist systems the that underpin their construction and maintenance.

    • tht@social.pwned.page
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Modern nuclear reactors won’t meltdown if shot, just turn off so only gonna be more dangerous if they specifically target electricity infrastructure

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Modern nuclear reactors won’t meltdown if shot

        we hope. never having tested nearby strikes, there’s no way to know how resilient to catastrophe these things are, and even when over-engineered with an eye on safety in the worst conditions, fukushima illustrates that everything can go wrong in a cascade and still render them unsafe.

        honestly, coastal nuclear power stations like diablo canyon and fukushima are going to be interacting with larger and more violent storms in the future, and tsunamis etc., perhaps there are better places for them.

        • tht@social.pwned.page
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Not really, modern Thorium reactors simply can’t meltdown, it’s no safety, simply not possible they are the Future

        • tht@social.pwned.page
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          Not really, modern Thorium reactors simply can’t meltdown, it’s no safety, simply not possible they are the Future

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            it may be physically impossible but until we test them with catastrophic conditions we won’t know. that said, their long history of fail-safe fail states and the extremely reduced physical constraints (lower pressure, lower temps, lower amounts of fissile material, lower enrichment, etc.,) make me think you’re right, but it’s gonna be hard to prove because we’re having such difficulty getting the larger industry to test the shit much less deploy it in any reasonable amount of time.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Not to make anyone nervous, but dropping a fuckass big missile on a pile of very secure and safe nuclear material will still scatter that material in a wide area, and wind will make it worse.

        But no, making a modern nuclear suffer a meltdown is basically impossible

        • tht@social.pwned.page
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          If someone drops a nuke I think you will have bigger problems than the lack of electricity

        • tht@social.pwned.page
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          If someone drops a nuke I think you will have bigger problems than the lack of electricity

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            That’s exactly what I’m saying… If you live near a nuclear power plant, you’re a potential target. Cause the bomb doesn’t destroy the plant, it destroys the city it’s in and several towns around it.

            The plant is a target because hitting the plant makes the power go out for the whole region, but your problem is the warhead. Meltdowns don’t factor in at any point.

  • letsgo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    What a dumb message. Of course this is not a drill. This is a phone. My drill doesn’t have the means to accept incoming messages.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    At my current location, I’d expect it to be an error, since I’m about 1500 miles away from the nearest worthwhile target (Chilean Antartica Region).

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    My wife’s cousin actually got this text while on vacation in Hawaii. Said he just sparked up a joint n hoped for the best. It worked, so maybe I’ll do the same.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    5 days ago

    I do the same thing for a missile alert that I do for a tornado alert…

    Film it from my front porch as it gets uncomfortably close, while my wife screams in the background for me to get back in the house.

  • dustycups@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 days ago

    The man sitting next to Ford was a bit sozzled by now. His eyes weaved their way up to Ford.
    'I thought,’ he said ‘that if the world was going to end we were meant to lie down or put a paper bag over our head or something.’
    ‘If you like, yes,’ said Ford. ‘That’s what they told us in the army,’ said the man, and his eyes began the long trek back towards his whisky. ‘Will that help?’ asked the barman. ‘No,’ said Ford and gave him a friendly smile.

  • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’d immediately go into the basement and start memeing. I have redundant internet connections for these kinds of situations so I should still be able to post memes. I’m locally hosting a Mastodon instance so I can post even if the internet is down globally. I also have a TCP-over-HF setup so that I can post memes anywhere in the world without intermediate infrastructure. If humanity is completely destroyed, I would start memeing and rickrolling on cave walls for future generation

    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      TCP-over-HF

      I am quite interested in that. How did you achieve it? Is there some license-free band? As far as I know encryption is not allowed for any ham radio transmissions. What’s the bandwidth? It seems packet radio on HF is 300 baud.

      • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        5 days ago

        TCP-over-HF is very slow, even with a lot of compression and low resolution the max throughput is about 4 memes per hour. I want maximum distribution of my memes so I wouldn’t use any encryption.

    • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean, I’ve got a WAN connection and two Sim Cards connected to different mobile providers, but at some point they probably all depend on parts of the same infrastructure.

      Maybe I should look into some distributed networking stuff…

    • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Honestly. Never got preppers.

      What world post nukes will be worth trying to live in? Best result instant vaporization.

      • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Is the pre-nuke world really anything to write home about? A life of hunting, fishing, and murdering drunk russian soldiers with piano wire is honestly more appealing than working an office job.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Nothing. Everyone is going to get the same alert and freak the fuck out, clogging all the roads, making it impossible to get to a shelter.

    I have 2 choices:

    1. Center of my cinderblock house and hope for the best.

    2. Submerged in the hot tub and hope for the best.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Meh, I’m in Scotland and the nearest even vaguely major city is 30 miles away, they could be setting off tsar bombas and I’d be fine from the several km of solid rock from various winding hills between me and the blast, probably wouldn’t even feel much of a pressure wave. Probably just start filling every container I can find with clean water.

    • Shapillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Same but in France.

      I live in an old house in a mountainous, sparsely populated area totally devoid of strategic ressources (Auvergne).

      I’d probably go to my basement which is dug in the granite substrate and lined with stone walls at least half a meter thick.

      The other option would be to go to the bottom of the neighbouring valley (at least 200m deep) and would be shielded by the surrounding terrain.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      If they airbursted one of those on Edinburgh, people in Glasgow would get third degree burns.

      It’s not gonna happen, but your comment got me thinking so I checked. AN602 is an egregious fucker.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        So a quick check on this, For a 50 megaton airburst on that city 30 miles away (bit closer by the crow flies) I am within the third degree burn radius and the light blast damage radius, However some basic trig and an altitude map say I have no direct line of sight to the airburst assuming its detonated at an altitude of 1km, so I’m free and clear as far as third degree burns are concerned due to that being a product of the flash. As for light blast damage its likely somewhat lessened by the lack of line of sight and very bumpy intervening terrain, though my village is right along a major river and gives us a comparatively straight (by the standards of river valleys) run right to that city so window breaking is probably going to be pretty hit or miss depending on building orientation and local obstructions.

        There’s also about 250m of elevation between Glasgow and Edinburgh which is fairly significant considering they’re 50km apart, a rough eyeball on an elevation map suggests that they each get at least partial obscurity from a nuke dropped on the other.