• magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If 100+ is the standard, “giga” is way too high. I’m thinking more along the lines of “century seductress”.

    Also, that was such a powerful burn I can feel the warmth from here.

    • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Not even a megaslut or a kiloslut. I wonder if a gigaslut is physically possible?

      Imagine one partner every ten seconds, during a 40h workweek, 52 weeks a year…

      That’s just 748,800 partners a year. Let’s call it an even 750,000. That’s a year and 4 months of professional fucking just to become a megaslut.

      Even for someone dedicating themselves to the job 60h a week during their whole life (60 years), would still be just 67 times a megaslut, only 6.7% of the way to become a gigaslut.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 hours ago

        See, a true slut isn’t limited to one partner at a time though, assuming a conventional functional set of anus, vagina, and mouth. If you also allow hands to count for slutification, then you could have as many as five at once.

        So, you could triple your numbers and get there in a reasonable period of time

        • Classy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          The technologies required to deal with the logistical challenge of moving five men into position every ten seconds would be impressive. That would be 108,000 men entering and leaving the fucking area on a regular rotation for sixty hours a week, plus they’re already all pricked up and lubed.

          This doesn’t even account for the philosophical aspect which is that, does merely penetrating for ten seconds max and skedaddling really constitute of a proper, quantifiable fuck? And if that is already dubious, the grounds for the ten-second handy are even shakier. New disciplines of philosophy would have to be erected (heh) to tackle such a quandry.

          • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 hours ago

            You could have one of those moving sidewalk conveyors, could probably get one going by every 5 seconds or so. I don’t think you have to actually fuck to be a slut, a whore yes, but not a slut.

              • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                microtopia is a cute spin on the classic factory game where instead of belts and inserters you have little ants that do all the work of moving things between places, harvesting resources and operating machines, so what I’m saying is that if any of these men want to share in the glory of facilitating the first gigaslut in our history then they better do it with their own two legs (or one, or none).

                in the game this is done through pheromone trails, and i do think in real life something similar could be achieved if you just follow the smell.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Don’t forget feet, apparently that’s a thing.

          And who says the men need to make contact? They could just stand in a circle raining down human nectar.

          A true slut is creative.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I agree, and personally find “chaste” or “prude” women unattractive.

    I find it very fascinating and difficult to relate to that large swaths of the population seem to see it differently. The number of times i’ve heard some man say “women should all be more modest” is mind-blowing for me.

    Women, as all humans, have value within themselves, and if they manage to express that (“self-expression”) then the outer world gets to see and share a part of that value. If people don’t act on their instincts, they might as well be dead. Non-constructivists “traditionalists” are only dead weight and don’t contribute anything to society, and i don’t comprehend how some people can see meaning outside of the expressions of the living’s soul. That is why self-expression is so important.

    • SitD@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      in a framework where people are just alive to mate this is a valid theory, but women can also self-express in more ways than offering sex 😂 also, people who only act on their instincts are even more dead than the ones that never act on their instincts. whenever your mode of operation is exactly and only one, never changing, that’s not a good thing.

      anyways, i agree with the core here, which is that vast amounts of the population heavily communicate what criteria others have to fulfill to be desirable. I’d much rather prefer everyone does what they want and chill out

    • Isoprenoid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 hours ago

      If people don’t act on their instincts, they might as well be dead.

      Psychopaths: “Oh boy, here I go killing again.”

      • Turret3857@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I feel like theres a bit of a leap in logic there, from being open about sex to killing people

        also I tho8ght that was a family guy quote and was SEVERELY disappointed when I looked it up

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This sounds great (as someone sorta into this) until you realize that youre probably also someone shell just fuck and then leave. Also if every woman and or man would be like this it wouldnt be special and you wouldnt look up to it soo… yeah

    • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      A relationship is not special because you fuck. It is special because you’re with a person you mesh well with. No amount of fucking will save a relationship that is not built on mutual compatibility.

        • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah thats what im saying. A relationship is both physical and emotional(for me at least). Theres a reason why most couples move in together, sleep together, etc. Youre not just fucking the person but their soul as well(literally what my english teacher said💀, but i agree).

        • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Nah. Knowing that someone has fucked 100 people, what this 4chan user is talking about, just tells you that that person does not view sex and relationships as a single thing.

          You only get a body count that high by doing one-offs, where you are just looking for sex and aren’t trying to turn it into a relationship. That tells you nothing about how good a partner they will be once they actually enter one.

          This assumption that sex should only happen between partners in a relationship is exactly why people jump into self-destructing relationships instead of waiting for a person they actually vibe with.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Legit? I joke about my mom being a ho, but my dad, holy shit.

        He was always faithful within the rules of their marriage, but in his younger days, and after they divorced? Dude was a man ho to a good extent. More so post divorce, since his younger days were pre sexual revolution, but I know people he grew up with, and he definitely was not a paragon of chastity at all.

        He also did a stint between his two marriages where he was leaving tracks all over three counties.

        I kid you not, I did home health for most of my working years, and I lost count of how many women (and a few men) would get “that look” when someone would ask which branch of the families that share my surname I was from, and I’d tell them. They’d ask if I knew him, and I’d say he was my dad, and that look, with blushes and some smiles would pop up.

        I’ve actually met plenty of his post divorce partners, since we’ve shared housing for a long time now. And he would sometimes come home with multiple. One night, the guy showed up with three women, another guy, and a bag from the drug store full of condoms.

        Shit. He was only maybe five years older than me at that time. Older than I am now.

        We joke about there being some hidden siblings for me and my sister, but he was too careful for that.