Day 5: Print Queue

Megathread guidelines

  • Keep top level comments as only solutions, if you want to say something other than a solution put it in a new post. (replies to comments can be whatever)
  • You can send code in code blocks by using three backticks, the code, and then three backticks or use something such as https://topaz.github.io/paste/ if you prefer sending it through a URL

FAQ

  • Sparrow_1029
    3·
    6 days ago

    Rust

    Real thinker. Messed around with a couple solutions before this one. The gist is to take all the pairwise comparisons given and record them for easy access in a ranking matrix.

    For the sample input, this grid would look like this (I left out all the non-present integers, but it would be a 98 x 98 grid where all the empty spaces are filled with Ordering::Equal):

       13 29 47 53 61 75 97
13  =  >  >  >  >  >  >
29  <  =  >  >  >  >  >
47  <  <  =  <  <  >  >
53  <  <  >  =  >  >  >
61  <  <  >  <  =  >  >
75  <  <  <  <  <  =  >
97  <  <  <  <  <  <  =

    I discovered this can’t be used for a total order on the actual puzzle input because there were cycles in the pairs given (see how rust changed sort implementations as of 1.81). I used usize for convenience (I did it with u8 for all the pair values originally, but kept having to cast over and over as usize). Didn’t notice a performance difference, but I’m sure uses a bit more memory.

    Also I Liked the simple_grid crate a little better than the grid one. Will have to refactor that out at some point.

    solution 
    use std::{cmp::Ordering, fs::read_to_string};

use simple_grid::Grid;

type Idx = (usize, usize);
type Matrix = Grid<Ordering>;
type Page = Vec<usize>;

fn parse_input(input: &str) -> (Vec<Idx>, Vec<Page>) {
    let split: Vec<&str> = input.split("\n\n").collect();
    let (pair_str, page_str) = (split[0], split[1]);
    let pairs = parse_pairs(pair_str);
    let pages = parse_pages(page_str);
    (pairs, pages)
}

fn parse_pairs(input: &str) -> Vec<Idx> {
    input
        .lines()
        .map(|l| {
            let (a, b) = l.split_once('|').unwrap();
            (a.parse().unwrap(), b.parse().unwrap())
        })
        .collect()
}

fn parse_pages(input: &str) -> Vec<Page> {
    input
        .lines()
        .map(|l| -> Page {
            l.split(",")
                .map(|d| d.parse::<usize>().expect("invalid digit"))
                .collect()
        })
        .collect()
}

fn create_matrix(pairs: &[Idx]) -> Matrix {
    let max = *pairs
        .iter()
        .flat_map(|(a, b)| [a, b])
        .max()
        .expect("iterator is non-empty")
        + 1;
    let mut matrix = Grid::new(max, max, vec![Ordering::Equal; max * max]);
    for (a, b) in pairs {
        matrix.replace_cell((*a, *b), Ordering::Less);
        matrix.replace_cell((*b, *a), Ordering::Greater);
    }
    matrix
}

fn valid_pages(pages: &[Page], matrix: &Matrix) -> usize {
    pages
        .iter()
        .filter_map(|p| {
            if check_order(p, matrix) {
                Some(p[p.len() / 2])
            } else {
                None
            }
        })
        .sum()
}

fn fix_invalid_pages(pages: &mut [Page], matrix: &Matrix) -> usize {
    pages
        .iter_mut()
        .filter(|p| !check_order(p, matrix))
        .map(|v| {
            v.sort_by(|a, b| *matrix.get((*a, *b)).unwrap());
            v[v.len() / 2]
        })
        .sum()
}

fn check_order(page: &[usize], matrix: &Matrix) -> bool {
    page.is_sorted_by(|a, b| *matrix.get((*a, *b)).unwrap() == Ordering::Less)
}

pub fn solve() {
    let input = read_to_string("inputs/day05.txt").expect("read file");
    let (pairs, mut pages) = parse_input(&input);
    let matrix = create_matrix(&pairs);
    println!("Part 1: {}", valid_pages(&pages, &matrix));
    println!("Part 2: {}", fix_invalid_pages(&mut pages, &matrix));
}

    On github

    *Edit: I did try switching to just using std::collections::HashMap, but it was 0.1 ms slower on average than using the simple_grid::Grid… Vec[idx] access is faster maybe?

    • CameronDevOPM
      4·
      6 days ago

      I think you may have over thought it, I just applied the rules by swapping unordered pairs until it was ordered :D cool solution though

    • the_beber@lemm.ee
      2·
      6 days ago

      Very cool approach. I didn’t think that far. I just wrote a compare function and hoped for the best.