Day 23: LAN Party

Megathread guidelines

  • Keep top level comments as only solutions, if you want to say something other than a solution put it in a new post. (replies to comments can be whatever)
  • You can send code in code blocks by using three backticks, the code, and then three backticks or use something such as https://topaz.github.io/paste/ if you prefer sending it through a URL

FAQ

  • VegOwOtenks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Haskell

    The solution for part two could now be used for part one as well but then I would have to rewrite part 1 .-.

    import Control.Arrow
    
    import Data.Ord (comparing)
    
    import qualified Data.List as List
    import qualified Data.Map as Map
    import qualified Data.Set as Set
    
    parse = Map.fromListWith Set.union . List.map (second Set.singleton) . uncurry (++) . (id &&& List.map (uncurry (flip (,)))) . map (break (== '-') >>> second (drop 1)) . takeWhile (/= "") . lines
    
    depthSearch connections ps
            | length ps == 4 && head ps == last ps = [ps]
            | length ps == 4 = []
            | otherwise  = head
                    >>> (connections Map.!)
                    >>> Set.toList
                    >>> List.map (:ps)
                    >>> List.concatMap (depthSearch connections)
                    $ ps
    
    interconnections (computer, connections) = depthSearch connections [computer]
    
    part1 = (Map.assocs &&& repeat)
            >>> first (List.map (uncurry Set.insert))
            >>> first (Set.toList . Set.unions)
            >>> uncurry zip
            >>> List.concatMap interconnections
            >>> List.map (Set.fromList . take 3)
            >>> List.filter (Set.fold (List.head >>> (== 't') >>> (||)) False)
            >>> Set.fromList
            >>> Set.size
    
    getLANParty computer connections = (connections Map.!)
            >>> findLanPartyComponent connections [computer]
            $ computer
    
    filterCandidates connections participants candidates = List.map (connections Map.!)
            >>> List.foldl Set.intersection candidates
            >>> Set.filter ((connections Map.!) >>> \ s -> List.all (flip Set.member s) participants)
            $ participants
    
    findLanPartyComponent connections participants candidates
            | Set.null validParticipants = participants
            | otherwise = findLanPartyComponent connections (nextParticipant : participants) (Set.delete nextParticipant candidates)
            where
                    nextParticipant = Set.findMin validParticipants
                    validParticipants = filterCandidates connections participants candidates
    
    part2 = (Map.keys &&& repeat)
            >>> uncurry zip
            >>> List.map ((uncurry getLANParty) >>> List.sort)
            >>> List.nub
            >>> List.maximumBy (comparing List.length)
            >>> List.intercalate ","
    
    main = getContents
            >>= print
            . (part1 &&& part2)
            . parse
    
    • lwhjp@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The solution for part two could now be used for part one as well but then I would have to rewrite part 1 .-.

      I initially thought that, but now I reconsider I’m not so sure. Isn’t it possible to have a 3-member clique overlapping two larger ones? In other words, there could be more than one way to partition the graph into completely connected components. Which means my solution to part 2 is technically incorrect. Bummer.

      • VegOwOtenks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        There probably are multiple ways to partition the graph. I haven’t applied any optimizations and my program checks members of already detected groups again, would that yield all possible partitions because I choose all the possible starting points for a k-clique?